On Nov 04, 2006 02:58 +0100, Jean-Marc Saffroy wrote: > Back then I suspected that the test was probably network bound (because of > high interrupt and packet rates vs. low CPU and disk usage), but I could > not find a good measurement. A tool showing metadata RPC statistics (such > as LMT maybe, but I didn't know it then) would have been useful.
You could use llstat.pl to show MDS RPC stats, or are you thinking of something else? Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
