On Sat, 4 Nov 2006, 'Andreas Dilger' wrote:
On Nov 04, 2006 02:58 +0100, Jean-Marc Saffroy wrote:
Back then I suspected that the test was probably network bound (because of
high interrupt and packet rates vs. low CPU and disk usage), but I could
not find a good measurement. A tool showing metadata RPC statistics (such
as LMT maybe, but I didn't know it then) would have been useful.
You could use llstat.pl to show MDS RPC stats, or are you thinking of
something else?
No, actually that's exactly what I had in mind. :-)
Thanks for the tip!
--
Jean-Marc Saffroy - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
_______________________________________________
Lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
