The cpu utilization bug was 10112, it was closed based on the belief that a patch from bug 10265 would fix the issue. That patch went to 1.4.7 Lustre according to the last comment, and we have not seen that at snl yet in order to test again. Ruth
> Message: 6 > Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2006 05:41:11 -0700 > From: Lee Ward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Re: Read performance issues at ORNL > To: Peter Bojanic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Cc: [email protected] > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Content-Type: text/plain > > On Thu, 2006-11-16 at 05:10 -0700, Lee Ward wrote: > > On Wed, 2006-11-15 at 15:56 -0500, Peter Bojanic wrote: > > > On 2006-11-15, at 12:36 , Peter Bojanic wrote: > > > > > > > Shane, > > > > > > > > Regarding the read performance issues you mentioned today... > > > > > > Some further news... > > > > > > - Sandia (Redstorm) reports 100% CPU utilization during reads on both > > > Linux and Cray systems; they're running Unicos 1.4, based on Lustre > > > 1.4.6 > > > > > > ===> Lee, is there a Bugzilla reported by Sandia that describes this > > > issue? > > > > Not that I know of. I believe we are supposed to submit one relative to > > the block side of Rose. > > *black > > > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
