Hi Andreas, First, I'd like to say that I tend to agree with Niklas' remarks in general. I think that having stable, QA'd releases is important, but considering that most of the Lustre audience is made of highly technical people running large installations and needing to run their own tests, having more frequent (not fully QA'd) releases would be a great deal of help.
On Friday 12 October 2007 03:29:08 am Andreas Dilger wrote: > Could you please indicate which bugs are missing? We're also missing 13438, which is really a stopper for this release. > The 13614 patch is actually in 1.6.3 under the original bug number > where the patch came from (bug 13596). Good to know. It wasn't clear since 13596 is not public, and the discussion in 13614 didn't indicate any progress on 13596 resolution, neither gave any confirmation that both bugs were resolved by the same fix. > As for 13438, I cannot explain why this didn't make it into the 1.6.3 > release, since it was definitely ready in time. What about a 1.6.3.1 including 13438? ;) Cheers, -- Kilian _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
