On Oct 12, 2007 08:53 +0200, Niklas Edmundsson wrote: > OK, I know that there is supposedly some QA before lustre releases and > that it might be the reason for fixes taking such a long time to > propagate, but still: It takes too long for fixes to end up in a > released version...
I tend to agree that it does take a long time between releases, and we are definitely trying to improve this. > The pkg-lustre packaging has six fixes from bugzilla applied, they > seem to have munged the bug numbers but it seems that only three of > them are in the 1.6.3 changelog. Could you please indicate which bugs are missing? > We have locally applied fixes from bug 13438 (lustre is totally > useless without it due to servers OOPS:ing) and 13614. None of them > seems to be in the 1.6.3 changelog. The 13614 patch is actually in 1.6.3 under the original bug number where the patch came from (bug 13596). As for 13438, I cannot explain why this didn't make it into the 1.6.3 release, since it was definitely ready in time. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Principal Software Engineer Cluster File Systems, Inc. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
