Sorry, I confused myself. We have a 1.2PB filesystem that will remain that size. We will be expanding our 958TB filesystem to ~2.4PB in the near future.
-Marc ---- D. Marc Stearman LC Lustre Systems Administrator [EMAIL PROTECTED] 925.423.9670 Pager: 1.888.203.0641 On Jan 14, 2008, at 1:36 PM, D. Marc Stearman wrote: > Klaus, > > We currently have a 1.2PB lustre filesystem that we will be expanding > to 2.4PB in the near future. I not sure about the highest sustained > IOPS, but we did have a user peak 19GB/s to one of our 500TB > filesystems recently. The backend for that was 16 DDN 8500 couplets > with write-cache turned OFF. > > -Marc > > ---- > D. Marc Stearman > LC Lustre Systems Administrator > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 925.423.9670 > Pager: 1.888.203.0641 > > > On Jan 14, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Klaus Steden wrote: > >> >> Hi there, >> >> I was asked by a friend of a business contact of mine the other day >> to share >> some information about Lustre; seems he's planning to build what will >> eventually be about a 3 PB file system. >> >> The CFS website doesn't appear to have any information on field >> deployments >> worth bragging about, so I figured I'd ask, just for fun; does >> anyone know: >> >> - the size of the largest working Lustre file system currently in >> the field >> - the highest sustained number of IOPS seen with Lustre, and what the >> backend was? >> >> cheers, >> Klaus >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Lustre-discuss mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
