Any spec's on IOPS rather than throughput? Thanks.
Jeff Kennedy QCT Engineering Compute 858-651-6592 > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:lustre-discuss- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Canon, Richard Shane > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 1:49 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Off-topic: largest existing Lustre file > system? > > > Klaus, > > Here are some that I know are pretty large. > > * RedStorm - I think it has two roughly 50 GB/s file systems. The > capacity may not be quite as large though. I think they used FC drives. > It was DDN 8500 although that may have changed. > * CEA - I think they have a file system approaching 100 GB/s. I think > it is DDN 9550. Not sure about the capacities. > * TACC has a large Thumper based system. Not sure of the specs. > * ORNL - We have a 44 GB/s file system with around 800 TB of total > capacity. That is DDN 9550. We also have two new file system (20 GB/s > and 10 GB/s currently LSI XBB2 and DDN 9550 respectively). Those have > around 800 TB each (after RAID6). > * We are planning a 200 GB/s, around 10 PB file system now. > > --Shane > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of D. Marc > Stearman > Sent: Monday, January 14, 2008 4:37 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [Lustre-discuss] Off-topic: largest existing Lustre file > system? > > Klaus, > > We currently have a 1.2PB lustre filesystem that we will be expanding > to 2.4PB in the near future. I not sure about the highest sustained > IOPS, but we did have a user peak 19GB/s to one of our 500TB > filesystems recently. The backend for that was 16 DDN 8500 couplets > with write-cache turned OFF. > > -Marc > > ---- > D. Marc Stearman > LC Lustre Systems Administrator > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 925.423.9670 > Pager: 1.888.203.0641 > > > On Jan 14, 2008, at 12:41 PM, Klaus Steden wrote: > > > > > Hi there, > > > > I was asked by a friend of a business contact of mine the other day > > to share > > some information about Lustre; seems he's planning to build what will > > eventually be about a 3 PB file system. > > > > The CFS website doesn't appear to have any information on field > > deployments > > worth bragging about, so I figured I'd ask, just for fun; does > > anyone know: > > > > - the size of the largest working Lustre file system currently in > > the field > > - the highest sustained number of IOPS seen with Lustre, and what the > > backend was? > > > > cheers, > > Klaus > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Lustre-discuss mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.clusterfs.com/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
