On Jun 16, 2008, at 1:01 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote: > > Just to mention - you can decode these files using the command: > > lctl df <logfile> <textfile>
Awesome. >> >> Would it be reasonable then, to upgrade the MDSs and OSSs but leave >> the >> clients at 1.6.4.2 or is that asking for trouble. I think this >> comes up a >> lot and I'm pretty sure people have said they do it successfully. >> I'm >> just wondering if it is a *design* goal that is architected in or >> just >> something that happens to work most of the time. > > The Lustre upgrade process is always planned to allow 1.X.Y to work > for > all 'Y' values, and between 1.X.Y_latest and 1.X_next.Z. We test > these combinations for Lustre releases, for both interoperability and > upgrade. In the vast majority of cases 1.X_next will work with any > 1.X > release, but we can't test all combinations so we don't make such > claims. Crazy awesome! Charlie Taylor UF HPC Center _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
