On Wed, 2008-08-06 at 11:08 -0600, Chris Worley wrote: > > Would you suggest I increase or decrease this value?
Neither, just make sure all nodes have the same value. I haven't seen anything that indicates that it needs to be changed. > Is there a way to inhibit the eviction, No. > or is that necessary to keep > really dead clients from locking-out files. Indeed. > All the systems (RHEL4 and 5 clients, Lustre servers) are on the same > ethernet and IB switches. There were no issues before the 1.6.5.1 > upgrade with the RHEL5 nodes. +rpctrace debug is probably the way to go to see what the client are(n't) doing in terms of keeping the MDS aware of it's existence. > Would a normal ping do it? No. > I can jury-rig all the RHEL5 nodes to ping the MDS. Of course, even if it would work, this is a hack that would simply be masquerading what is likely another, more real problem. You need to get to the root of the real problem. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
