dOn Wed, 2008-08-06 at 12:11 -0600, Chris Worley wrote: > On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 11:26 AM, Brian J. Murrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +rpctrace debug is probably the way to go to see what the client > > are(n't) doing in terms of keeping the MDS aware of it's existence. > > > > The log from the client perspective starts with a lot of packet mismatches: > > 00000100:00020000:3:1217629906.902955:0:5592:0:(events.c:116:reply_in_callback()) > early reply sized 176, expect 128 > 00000100:00020000:3:1217633409.730495:0:5590:0:(events.c:116:reply_in_callback()) > early reply sized 240, expect 128
Given the amount of debug provided, this looks like it could be bug 16534 which is on my plate to test the solution for and land. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
