On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 06:03 -0700, Johnlya wrote: > I test it fowllowing: > 1. mount -t lustre /dev/sdb1 /mnt/mdt > result: > dev/sdb1 on /mnt/mdt type lustre (rw)
As you would expect, yes? > 2.mount.lustre /dev/sdb1 /mnt/mdt > result: > dev/sdb1 on /mnt/mdt type lustre (0) > > Please tell me why? Because mount.lustre is not really meant to be called directly but rather as a helper for mount. You could use strace on your "mount -t lustre" command and see how it's calling mount.lustre to get some more insight. > Does it effect Lustre error and problem? I'm not sure. b.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
