I found its explain "mount.lustre is used to start a Lustre client or target service. This program should not be called directly; rather it is a helper program invoked through mount(8)." in Manual. This is the same that you said.
mount.lustre: “（0）” it can be think of "(rw)", but it doesn't mount loop device. So I think that Lustre should prevent users from call directly the command "mount.lustre". Like as the command "mount.smbfs" is not called directly. Thank you! On Thu, 2008-10-30, at 21:38, "Brian J. Murrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, 2008-10-30 at 06:03 -0700, Johnlya wrote: > > I test it fowllowing: > > 1. mount -t lustre /dev/sdb1 /mnt/mdt > > result: > > dev/sdb1 on /mnt/mdt type lustre (rw) > > As you would expect, yes? > > > 2.mount.lustre /dev/sdb1 /mnt/mdt > > result: > > dev/sdb1 on /mnt/mdt type lustre (0) > > > Please tell me why? > > Because mount.lustre is not really meant to be called directly but > rather as a helper for mount. You could use strace on your "mount -t > lustre" command and see how it's calling mount.lustre to get some more > insight. > > > Does it effect Lustre error and problem? > > I'm not sure. > > b. > > signature.asc > < 1KViewDownload > > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED]://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
