On Freitag 25 September 2009 12:31:58 you wrote: > Just attaching the patch on the bug is sufficient, and marking > "inspection ? [email protected]". It is fine even if you don't think > this is a proper fix (though please add some words to that effect), > because it will at least provide a starting point for a better fix > if one is needed.
Done. Just to get back to the subject, what _is_ the proper sequence to deactivate an OST ? We have used our scenario (lctl set_param resp. conf_param) for deactivating/copying up to now 3 x 6,5TB lustre Partitions (OSTs) and it worked ok. Are we just hard hearted enough to ignore the underlying lustre mechanisms ? Thanks and Regards Heiko
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
