On Sep 25, 2009 12:56 +0200, Heiko Schr�ter wrote: > On Freitag 25 September 2009 12:31:58 you wrote: > > Just attaching the patch on the bug is sufficient, and marking > > "inspection ? [email protected]". It is fine even if you don't think > > this is a proper fix (though please add some words to that effect), > > because it will at least provide a starting point for a better fix > > if one is needed. > > Just to get back to the subject, what _is_ the proper sequence to > deactivate an OST ?
What you posted is fine. > We have used our scenario (lctl set_param resp. conf_param) for > deactivating/copying up to now 3 x 6,5TB lustre Partitions (OSTs) and it > worked ok. > Are we just hard hearted enough to ignore the underlying lustre mechanisms ? > > Thanks and Regards > Heiko Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Sr. Staff Engineer, Lustre Group Sun Microsystems of Canada, Inc. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
