On 11/25/10 8:18 PM, Ashley Pittman wrote: > Picking up from something that was said at SC last week I believe it was > Andreas that mentioned the possibility of patch-less kernel support. This is > something that would be immensely useful to us for a variety of reasons. > > Has there been any recent work into investigating how much work would be > involved in implementing this and what's the feeling for if it could be done > though changes to Lustre only or a case of submitting a number of patches > upstream? I have made some small investigation for the patchless-server recently. I am not sure whether you can check the following link or not: http://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/IT-13
Cheers, -- Nasf > Ashley. > _______________________________________________ > Lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
