On 25 Nov 2010, at 15:37, Fan Yong wrote: > On 11/25/10 8:18 PM, Ashley Pittman wrote: >> Picking up from something that was said at SC last week I believe it was >> Andreas that mentioned the possibility of patch-less kernel support. This >> is something that would be immensely useful to us for a variety of reasons. >> >> Has there been any recent work into investigating how much work would be >> involved in implementing this and what's the feeling for if it could be done >> though changes to Lustre only or a case of submitting a number of patches >> upstream? > I have made some small investigation for the patchless-server recently.
> I am not sure whether you can check the following link or not: > http://jira.whamcloud.com/browse/IT-13 No I can't, my account doesn't have the permissions required to read that. The Oracle bug 21524 is what I think I was looking for but the more information I have on this subject the better. Ashley. _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
