On 2012-01-05, at 3:29 AM, Michael Sternberg wrote: > I am wondering about the release matrix for Lustre vs. RHEL/CentOS. > > ============================================== > Lustre lustre.org whamcloud > Release ------------ ------------ > el5 el6 el5 el6 > ---------------------------------------------- > 1.8.7 client yes no yes yes > 1.8.7 server yes no yes no > > 2.0 (discontinued) n/a > > 2.1 client n/a yes yes > 2.1 server n/a yes yes > ============================================== > > http://downloads.lustre.org/public/lustre/v1.8/lustre_1.8.7/ > http://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/lustre-1.8.7-wc1/el6/ > http://downloads.whamcloud.com/public/lustre/lustre-2.1.0/ > > > It appears that the current recommended production release is Lustre-1.8, > and, since there is no server for el6 I take that as a strong hint to stick > to el5.
For new deployments the recommended version is 2.1.0 with RHEL6.1. We are starting work on a 2.1.1 maintenance release for the spring. > Is there some more information public? I was planning to upgrade a cluster to > el6. Ideally, I'd like to have servers and user nodes all on the same major > OS release. However, stability will trump that. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Whamcloud, Inc. Principal Engineer http://www.whamcloud.com/ _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
