Alex There will be a note going out to wc-discuss early next week about 2.1.1. The focus is on 2.2 this week with the imminent feature freeze.
Regards Peter On 12-01-05 12:18 PM, Alex Kulyavtsev wrote: > On Jan 5, 2012, at 12:12 PM, Peter Jones wrote: >> On 12-01-05 9:21 AM, Andreas Dilger wrote: > ... >>> For new deployments the recommended version is 2.1.0 with RHEL6.1. >>> We are >>> starting work on a 2.1.1 maintenance release for the spring. >> While it is not often that I would disagree with Andreas, I would say >> that the answer on this point depends upon your timing. Right now, if >> stability is your primary driver (and it sounds like it is) then I would >> recommend 1.8.7-wc1. The early feedback from 2.1 is very encouraging, >> but I think that we need a little more production feedback before we >> could confidently assert that 2.1.x is the default option. > > Peter, > if by some reason (features) we need to stick with 2.1.x and rebuild > 2.1.0 with 2.1.1 patches to get more stability if needed, > is there > - separate branch for it (2.1.1) > - JIRA tracker for bug fixes for 2.1.1 release > > Alex. > > -- Peter Jones Whamcloud, Inc. www.whamcloud.com _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
