Scott
On 8/14/2014 8:40 AM, Scott Nolin wrote:
Hi Andrew, Much of this information is notes and not in a finished format, so it's a problem of how much time we have. The other issue is contributing to the manual is somewhat cumbersome as you have to submit patches - https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/display/PUB/Making+changes+to+the+Lustre+Manual+source The bar there is a bit higher - we have to be pretty confident the information that's added is correct, know if it's just for some versions of lustre, and so on. As opposed to simply "here are our notes that work for us". I will try to review what we have and if anything looks really incorrect or missing in the lustre manual we will attempt to issue a patch. I think in general the lustre manual is correct, but not always sufficient. I think the process does make sure incorrect stuff doesn't go in at least, but makes it hard to add information. Scott On 8/14/2014 6:13 AM, Andrew Holway wrote:Hi Scott, Great job! Would you consider merging with the standard Lustre docs? https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/display/PUB/Documentation Thanks, Andrew
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
