Scott, Perhaps there might be a way to collect 'contrib' documents that are not core to Lustre with OpenSFS. I suggest that you could make a place at wiki.opensfs.org for them. I think that we can ask the [email protected] group about it first (copied).
LWG, can we host 'contrib' docs somewhere on the OpenSFS wiki? Perhaps we should create a whole new "Documentation" sidebar to get started? Thanks, -Cory On 8/14/14, 8:41 AM, "Scott Nolin" <[email protected]> wrote: >I should also add - many of those documents just don't belong in the >lustre manual anyway, such as monitoring JBOD arrays. But nonetheless >may be useful for some lustre installations. > >Scott > >On 8/14/2014 8:40 AM, Scott Nolin wrote: >> Hi Andrew, >> >> Much of this information is notes and not in a finished format, so it's >> a problem of how much time we have. >> >> The other issue is contributing to the manual is somewhat cumbersome as >> you have to submit patches - >> >>https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/display/PUB/Making+changes+to+the+Lustre+Manu >>al+source >> >> >> The bar there is a bit higher - we have to be pretty confident the >> information that's added is correct, know if it's just for some versions >> of lustre, and so on. As opposed to simply "here are our notes that work >> for us". >> >> I will try to review what we have and if anything looks really incorrect >> or missing in the lustre manual we will attempt to issue a patch. >> >> I think in general the lustre manual is correct, but not always >> sufficient. I think the process does make sure incorrect stuff doesn't >> go in at least, but makes it hard to add information. >> >> Scott >> >> On 8/14/2014 6:13 AM, Andrew Holway wrote: >>> Hi Scott, >>> >>> Great job! Would you consider merging with the standard Lustre docs? >>> >>> https://wiki.hpdd.intel.com/display/PUB/Documentation >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Andrew >>> > _______________________________________________ Lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/mailman/listinfo/lustre-discuss
