Maybe someone can answer this in the context of this question, is there any performance gain over classic filers when you are using only a single OSS?
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 9:56 AM, Ravi Konila <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Majid > > It is better to go for HA for both OSS and MDS. You would need 2 nos of > MDS and 2 nos of OSS (identical configuration). > Also use latest Lustre 2.10.1 release. > > Regards > *Ravi Konila* > > > *From:* Amjad Syed > *Sent:* Monday, October 30, 2017 1:17 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* [lustre-discuss] 1 MDS and 1 OSS > > Hello > We are in process in procuring one small Lustre filesystem giving us 120 > TB of storage using Lustre 2.X. > The vendor has proposed only 1 MDS and 1 OSS as a solution. > The query we have is that is this configuration enough , or we need more > OSS? > The MDS and OSS server are identical with regards to RAM (64 GB) and HDD > (300GB) > > Thanks > Majid > > ------------------------------ > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > > > _______________________________________________ > lustre-discuss mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org > >
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
