Hmm. That is an odd one from a quick thought...
However, IF you are planning on growing and adding OSSes/OSTs, this is
not a bad way to get started and used to how everything works. It is
basically a single stripe storage.
If you are not planning on growing, I would lean towards gluster on 2
boxes. I do that often, actually. A single MDS/OSS has zero redundancy,
unless something is being done at harware level and that would help in
availability.
NFS is quite viable too, but you would be splitting the available
storage on 2 boxes.
Brian Andrus
On 10/30/2017 12:47 AM, Amjad Syed wrote:
Hello
We are in process in procuring one small Lustre filesystem giving us
120 TB of storage using Lustre 2.X.
The vendor has proposed only 1 MDS and 1 OSS as a solution.
The query we have is that is this configuration enough , or we need
more OSS?
The MDS and OSS server are identical with regards to RAM (64 GB) and
HDD (300GB)
Thanks
Majid
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
