I sent the announcement out on the 3rd to the lustre-discuss, lustre-devel, lustre-announce and LWG mailing lists. I still think that qualifies those using it already as early adopters though :-)
On 2018-04-11, 9:07 AM, "lustre-discuss on behalf of E.S. Rosenberg" <lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org> on behalf of esr+lus...@mail.hebrew.edu<mailto:esr+lus...@mail.hebrew.edu>> wrote: Actually that linked article is dated today, so I guess the official mail announcement was still to come! On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:06 PM, E.S. Rosenberg <esr+lus...@mail.hebrew.edu<mailto:esr+lus...@mail.hebrew.edu>> wrote: I'm on lustre-discuss and HPDD-discuss and didn't get it on either. Thanks anyhow! On Wed, Apr 11, 2018 at 7:04 PM, Patrick Farrell <p...@cray.com<mailto:p...@cray.com>> wrote: I think you missed it – It came out a few days ago, and Peter Jones announced it in what I assume was the usual manner. Maybe there’s a “which lists were sent to” issue? * Patrick From: lustre-discuss <lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss-boun...@lists.lustre.org>> on behalf of "E.S. Rosenberg" <esr+lus...@mail.hebrew.edu<mailto:esr%2blus...@mail.hebrew.edu>> Date: Wednesday, April 11, 2018 at 10:58 AM To: "Dilger, Andreas" <andreas.dil...@intel.com<mailto:andreas.dil...@intel.com>> Cc: "lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>" <lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>> Subject: Re: [lustre-discuss] Upgrade to 2.11: unrecognized mount option OT: Did I miss the mail announcing Lustre 2.11 or all the recent 2.11 mails early adapters? Thanks, Eli On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 2:58 AM, Dilger, Andreas <andreas.dil...@intel.com<mailto:andreas.dil...@intel.com>> wrote: On Apr 6, 2018, at 06:27, Thomas Roth <t.r...@gsi.de<mailto:t.r...@gsi.de>> wrote: > > Hi all, > > (don't know if it isn't a bit early to complain yet, but) > I have upgraded an OSS and MDS von 2.10.2 to 2.11.0, just installing the > downloaded rpms - no issues here, except when mounting the MDS: > > > LDISKFS-fs (drbd0): Unrecognized mount option > > "context="unconfined_u:object_r:user_tmp_t:s0"" or missing value > > This mount option is visible also by 'tunefs.lustre --dryrun', so I followed > a tip on this list from last May and did > > > tunefs.lustre --mountfsoptions="user_xattr,errors=remount-ro" /dev/drbd0 > > = keeping the rest of the mount options. Afterwards the mount worked. > > > I checked, I formatted this MDS with > > > mkfs.lustre --reformat --mgs --mdt --fsname=hebetest --index=0 > --servicenode=10.20.1.198@o2ib5 --servicenode=10.20.1.199@o2ib5 > --mgsnode=10.20.1.198@o2ib5 --mgsnode=10.20.1.199@o2ib5 > --mkfsoptions="-E stride=4,stripe-width=20 -O flex_bg,mmp,uninit_bg" > /dev/drbd0 > > > Just the defaults here? > Where did the unknown mount option come from, and what does it mean anyway? I suspect it's automatically added by SELinux, but I couldn't tell you where or why. Hopefully one of the people more familiar with SELinux can answer, and it can be handled properly in the future. Cheers, Andreas -- Andreas Dilger Lustre Principal Architect Intel Corporation _______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org<mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________ lustre-discuss mailing list lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
