$ man lfs-fid2path.1
lfs-fid2path(1) user utilities
lfs-fid2path(1)
NAME
lfs fid2path - print the pathname(s) for a file identifier
SYNOPSIS
lfs fid2path [OPTION]... <FSNAME|MOUNT_POINT> <FID>...
DESCRIPTION
lfs fid2path maps a numeric Lustre File IDentifier (FID) to one or
more pathnames
that have hard links to that file. This allows resolving filenames for
FIDs used in console
error messages, and resolving all of the pathnames for a file that has
multiple hard links.
Pathnames are resolved relative to the MOUNT_POINT specified, or
relative to the
filesystem mount point if FSNAME is provided.
OPTIONS
-f, --print-fid
Print the FID with the path.
-c, --print-link
Print the current link number with each pathname or parent
directory.
-l, --link=LINK
If a file has multiple hard links, then print only the specified
LINK, starting at link 0.
If multiple FIDs are given, but only one pathname is needed for
each file, use --link=0.
EXAMPLES
$ lfs fid2path /mnt/testfs [0x200000403:0x11f:0x0]
/mnt/testfs/etc/hosts
On Sep 3, 2021, at 14:51, Alastair Basden
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Hi,
lctl get_param mdt.*.exports.*.open_files returns:
[email protected]_files=
[0x20000b90e:0x10aa:0x0]
[email protected]_files=
[0x20000b90e:0x21b3:0x0]
[email protected]_files=
[0x20000b90e:0x21b3:0x0]
[0x20000b90e:0x21b4:0x0]
[0x20000b90c:0x1574:0x0]
[0x20000b90c:0x1575:0x0]
[0x20000b90c:0x1576:0x0]
Doesn't seem to be many open, so I don't think it's a problem of open files.
Not sure which bit of this I need to use with lfs fid2path either...
Cheers,
Alastair.
On Fri, 3 Sep 2021, Andreas Dilger wrote:
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
You can also check "mdt.*.exports.*.open_files" on the MDTs for a list of FIDs
open on each client, and use "lfs fid2path" to resolve them to a pathname.
On Sep 3, 2021, at 02:09, Degremont, Aurelien via lustre-discuss
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>>
wrote:
Hi
It could be a bug, but most of the time, this is due to an open-unlinked file,
typically a log file which is still in use and some processes keep writing to
it until it fills the OSTs it is using.
Look for such files on your clients (use lsof).
Aurélien
Le 03/09/2021 09:50, « lustre-discuss au nom de Alastair Basden »
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
au nom de
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>>
a écrit :
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click
links or open attachments unless you can confirm the sender and know the
content is safe.
Hi,
We have a file system where each OST is a single SSD.
One of those is reporting as 100% full (lfs df -h /snap8):
snap8-OST004d_UUID 5.8T 2.0T 3.5T 37% /snap8[OST:77]
snap8-OST004e_UUID 5.8T 5.5T 7.5G 100% /snap8[OST:78]
snap8-OST004f_UUID 5.8T 2.0T 3.4T 38% /snap8[OST:79]
However, I can't find any files on it:
lfs find --ost snap8-OST004e /snap8/
returns nothing.
I guess that it has filled up, and that there is some bug or other that is
now preventing proper behaviour - but I could be wrong.
Does anyone have any suggestions?
Essentially, I'd like to find some of the files and delete or migrate
some, and thus return it to useful production.
Cheers,
Alastair.
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]><mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Whamcloud
Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Lustre Principal Architect
Whamcloud
_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
