I supposed you removed the /etc/modprobe.d/lustre.conf completely.

I only have the lnet service enabled at startup, I do not start any lustre3 service, but I am running lustre 2.12.0 sorry not 2.14

so something might be different.

Did you start over with a clean configuration ?

Did you reboot your system to make sure it picks up the new config ? At least for me sometimes the lnet module does not unload correctly.

Also I have to mention in my setup I did disable discovery also on the OSSes not only client side.

Generally it is not advisable to disable Multi-rail unless you have backward compatibility issues with older lustre peers.

But disabling discovery will also disable Multi-rail.

You can try with

lenetctl set discovery 0

as  you already did,

then you do

lnetctl -b export > /etc/lnet.conf

check discovery is set to 0 in the file and if not edit it and set it to 0.

reboot and see if things changes.

If anyway you did not define any tcp interface in lnet.conf  you should not see any tcp peers.


On 9/13/21 2:59 PM, Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.] wrote:

Thanks Rick.  I removed my lnet modprobe options and adapted my lnet.conf file to:

# cat /etc/lnet.conf

ip2nets:

- net-spec: o2ib1

   interfaces:

      0: ib0

global:

    discovery: 0

#

Now "lnetctl export" doesn't have any reference to NIDs on the other networks, so that's good.  However, I'm still seeing some values that concern me:

# lnetctl export | grep -e Multi -e discover | sort -u

    discovery: 1

Multi-Rail: True

#

Any idea why discovery is still 1 if I'm specifying that to 0 in the lnet.conf file?  I'm a little concerned that with Multi-Rail still True and discovery on, the client could still find its way back to the TCP route.

*From: *Riccardo Veraldi <riccardo.vera...@cnaf.infn.it>
*Date: *Monday, September 13, 2021 at 3:16 PM
*To: *"Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.]" <darby.vicke...@nasa.gov>, "lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org" <lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] Re: [lustre-discuss] Disabling multi-rail dynamic discovery

I would use configuration on /etc/lnet.conf and I would not use anymore the older style configuration in

/etc/modprobe.d/lustre.conf

for example in my /etc/lnet.conf configuration I have:

*ip2nets:
 - net-spec: o2ib
   interfaces:
      0: ib0
 - net-spec: tcp
   interfaces:
      0: enp24s0f0
global:
    discovery: 0*

As I disabled the auto discovery.

Regarding ko2ib you can just use /etc/modprobe.d/ko2iblnd.conf

Mine looks like this:

*options ko2iblnd peer_credits=128 peer_credits_hiw=64 credits=1024 ntx=2048 map_on_demand=256 fmr_pool_size=2048 fmr_flush_trigger=512 fmr_cache=1 conns_per_peer=4*

Hope it helps.

Rick

On 9/13/21 1:53 PM, Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.] via lustre-discuss wrote:

    Hello,

    I would like to know how to turn off auto discovery of peers on a
    client.  This seems like it should be straight forward but we
    can't get it to work. Please fill me in on what I'm missing.

    We recently upgraded our servers to 2.14.  Our servers are
    multi-homed (1 tcp network and 2 separate IB networks) but we want
    them to be single rail.  On one of our clusters we are still using
    the 2.12.6 client and it uses one of the IB networks for lustre. 
    The modprobe file from one of the client nodes:

    # cat /etc/modprobe.d/lustre.conf

    options lnet networks=o2ib1(ib0)

    options ko2iblnd map_on_demand=32

    #

    The client does have a route to the TCP network.  This is intended
    to allow jobs on the compute nodes to access licenese servers, not
    for any serious I/O.  We recently discovered that due to some
    instability in the IB fabric, the client was trying to fail over
    to tcp:

    # dmesg | grep Lustre

    [  250.205912] Lustre: Lustre: Build Version: 2.12.6

    [  255.886086] Lustre: Mounted scratch-client

    [  287.247547] Lustre:
    3472:0:(client.c:2146:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) @@@ Request
    sent has timed out for sent delay: [sent 1630699139/real 0] 
    req@ffff98deb9358480 x1709911947878336/t0(0)
    o9->hpfs-fsl-OST0001-osc-ffff9880cfb80000@192.52.98.33@tcp:28/4
    <mailto:hpfs-fsl-OST0001-osc-ffff9880cfb80000@192.52.98.33@tcp:28/4>
    lens 224/224 e 0 to 1 dl 1630699145 ref 2 fl Rpc:XN/0/ffffffff rc 0/-1

    [  739.832744] Lustre:
    3526:0:(client.c:2146:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) @@@ Request
    sent has timed out for sent delay: [sent 1630699591/real 0] 
    req@ffff98deb935da00 x1709911947883520/t0(0)
    o400->scratch-MDT0000-mdc-ffff98b0f1fc0800@192.52.98.31@tcp:12/10
    <mailto:scratch-MDT0000-mdc-ffff98b0f1fc0800@192.52.98.31@tcp:12/10>
    lens 224/224 e 0 to 1 dl 1630699598 ref 2 fl Rpc:XN/0/ffffffff rc 0/-1

    [  739.832755] Lustre:
    3526:0:(client.c:2146:ptlrpc_expire_one_request()) Skipped 5
    previous similar messages

    [  739.832762] LustreError: 166-1: MGC10.150.100.30@o2ib1:
    Connection to MGS (at 192.52.98.30@tcp) was lost; in progress
    operations using this service will fail

    [  739.832769] Lustre: hpfs-fsl-MDT0000-mdc-ffff9880cfb80000:
    Connection to hpfs-fsl-MDT0000 (at 192.52.98.30@tcp) was lost; in
    progress operations using this service will wait for recovery to
    complete

    [ 1090.978619] LustreError: 167-0:
    scratch-MDT0000-mdc-ffff98b0f1fc0800: This client was evicted by
    scratch-MDT0000; in progress operations using this service will fail.

    I'm pretty sure this is due to the auto discovery.  Again, from a
    client:

    # lnetctl export | grep -e Multi -e discover | sort -u

         discovery: 0

           Multi-Rail: True

    #

    We want to restrict lustre to only the IB NID but its not clear
    exactly how to do that.

    Here is one attempt:


    [root@r1i1n18 lnet]# service lustre3 stop

    Shutting down lustre mounts

    Lustre modules successfully unloaded

    [root@r1i1n18 lnet]# lsmod | grep lnet

    [root@r1i1n18 lnet]# cat /etc/lnet.conf

    global:

    discovery: 0

    [root@r1i1n18 lnet]# service lustre3 start

    Mounting /ephemeral... done.

    Mounting /nobackup... done.

    [root@r1i1n18 lnet]# lnetctl export | grep -e Multi -e discover |
    sort -u

    discovery: 1

    Multi-Rail: True

    [root@r1i1n18 lnet]#

    And a similar attempt (same lnet.conf file), but trying to turn
    off the discovery before doing the mounts:

    [root@r1i1n18 lnet]# service lustre3 stop

    Shutting down lustre mounts

    Lustre modules successfully unloaded

    [root@r1i1n18 lnet]# modprobe lnet

    [root@r1i1n18 lnet]# lnetctl set discovery 0

    [root@r1i1n18 lnet]# service lustre3 start

    Mounting /ephemeral... done.

    Mounting /nobackup... done.

    [root@r1i1n18 lnet]# lnetctl export | grep -e Multi -e discover | sort -u

         discovery: 0

           Multi-Rail: True

    [root@r1i1n18 lnet]#

    If someone can point me in the right direction, I'd appreciate it.

    Thanks,

    Darby



    _______________________________________________

    lustre-discuss mailing list

    lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org  <mailto:lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org>

    http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org  
<https://gcc02.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flists.lustre.org%2Flistinfo.cgi%2Flustre-discuss-lustre.org&data=04%7C01%7Cdarby.vicker-1%40nasa.gov%7Cb2a81e07db45418e29df08d976fbbebd%7C7005d45845be48ae8140d43da96dd17b%7C0%7C0%7C637671645889714604%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&sdata=oRqJx%2FcdY29ppvvulneydVZZY%2Frm1vD8EddtDofafgk%3D&reserved=0>

_______________________________________________
lustre-discuss mailing list
lustre-discuss@lists.lustre.org
http://lists.lustre.org/listinfo.cgi/lustre-discuss-lustre.org
  • [... Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.] via lustre-discuss
    • ... Riccardo Veraldi
    • ... Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.] via lustre-discuss
      • ... Riccardo Veraldi
        • ... Horn, Chris via lustre-discuss
          • ... Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.] via lustre-discuss
            • ... Horn, Chris via lustre-discuss
    • ... Vicker, Darby J. (JSC-EG111)[Jacobs Technology, Inc.] via lustre-discuss
      • ... Andreas Dilger via lustre-discuss
        • ... Andreas Dilger via lustre-discuss

Reply via email to