> This often just dows mean it was converted in something like a guitar! > The label dowsn't say what kind of repair it was. > > Thomas It seems the repairer only MOVED the bridge toward the rose, not a pretty thing, and strangely the same atrocity that the Brunner lute suffered. RT
>>> Does this imply that it was originally made by Jauck ? and the >> later >>> label is obviously a repair made in 1830. >>> Michael Thames >> The implication is that it was STILL USED in 1830. >> RT >> >>> >>>> >>>>> description in the booklet says the instrument has two >> inscriptions: >>>>> 1. 'Joannes Jauck me Fecit Graecii Anno 17(38)' >>>>> 2. 'Mattheus Ignatius Bradstetter Reparavit Viennae Anno 1830' >>>> This is fascinating. There is an implication of active use in the >> evidence >>>> of professional repairs. I'd be curious about the provenance of >> this >>>> instrument. >>>> RT >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >
