Dear G�ran,

I was completely aware of the fact, that you were not responsible for
the piece in question to appear on the internet.

The reason why I reposted Albert Reyerman's mail was that it gives an
example of a public library that believes it has control over the publishing
rights of sources in their possession. A point of view that I find
very questionable.

I am sorry if you feel that my mail might give a negative impression of
you. That was not my intention. I also admit, I should have mentioned
what your answer to A. Reyerman's mail was.

Best wishes,
Stefan Ecke



Reply via email to