Dear Jurek and All:
Just because Francesco didn't include any dances in his publications
doesn't mean he never played them. A musician of his caliber may not have
needed an intabulation to play a dance.
Yours,
Jim
Jerzy ZAK
<[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wp.pl> cc:
Subject: Re: (serious/popular)
12/13/2003 06:16
PM
Thanks for joinin, Peter,
On Friday, Dec 12, 2003, at 12:31 Europe/Warsaw, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
> Dear Jurek (Jerzy),
> ... There were real stars among both groups, whose names became known
> to the history, and thousands of others forgotten.'
.
> Look at for example the editions of Francesco da Milano or Bakfark:
> Only 'serious/highbrow' music like fantasies and intabulations. Not a
> single 'popular' piece like songs, or dance music and the like.
> Thus without saying it, they made very much a distinction between
> serious and popular.
> Best regards, Peter
So, in a way, they were both ''serious and popular''. But I, since
long, cannot accept somehow they were really that serious and profund,
without creating/playing a single dance movement. Simply, I do not
trust, life is not that sad all the time...
Jurek (for Jerzy), which I really prefare - thaks Peter!
- Re: (serious/popular) Jerzy ZAK
- Re: (serious/popular) P-Kiraly
- Re: (serious/popular) Thomas Schall
- Re: (serious/popular) Jerzy ZAK
- Re: (serious/popular) James A Stimson
- Re: (serious/popular) Denys Stephens
- Re: (serious/popular) Roman Turovsky
- Re: (serious/popular) P-Kiraly
- Re: (serious/popular) Ed Durbrow
- Re: (serious/popular) Jon Murphy
- Re: (serious/popular) P-Kiraly
