Ed wrote:
> Franceso is absolutely correct.  Going from a .40 to a .38 will not 
> improve
> string life.  The smaller diameter does not have enough fibers to support 
> a

In my experience, it does. Take my archlute, 64cm. It has to be in 415 as 
well as 440. At 415 a 0.40mm first string will have to endure 36N. Workable. 
At 440 I use a good quality 0.38mm which will be stretched to something like 
37N. That's getting dangerous, but a string will usually last two to three 
weeks, but at least one week.
When I tune the instrument from 415 to 440 I leave on the 0.40mm top string 
till it breaks. That's quickly, usually, no wonder at a little over 40N! The 
other way around, however, when I tune down from 440 to 415 the 0.38 will 
last very, very long at 33N. It's a little sloppy, but still quite 
responsive.
So my experience is that a good quality (Nicholas Baldock) 0.38mm (64cm, 
415, g', 33N) gut will last many, many weeks on a much (ab)used instrument.

Francesco wrote:
>>perhaps a tiny string is even more delicate and more easy to break. If the
>>tuning pitch was a=440Hz I guess the problem is that 62cm is quite a long
>>vibrating length for a lute tuned in g. A safe length for gut strung lutes
>>tuned in g at 440Hz pitch is around 59-60cm. With this measure a gut
>>chanterelle can last 2-3 weeks in normal conditions.

Exactly. My 62cm 10-course is tuned at 415 and a first string normally lasts 
for many weeks. I had a bad-luck weekend. That is what I was saying.

David 




To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to