Actually, thanks to the genius of that cave man we can insure our world-destroying machines at a reasonable price.
Gary ----- Original Message ----- From: "gary digman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Edward Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "lutelist" <[email protected]> Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2007 2:20 AM Subject: [LUTE] Re: lute is hard (was: mics arrived) > Thanks to the genius of that cave man here we are plucking away. > > Gary > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Edward Martin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "gary digman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Saturday, July 07, 2007 11:22 AM > Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: lute is hard (was: mics arrived) > > > > As I said, it's so easy, that even a cave man can do it.. > > > > ed > > > > At 05:48 AM 7/7/2007 -0700, you wrote: > > >I find Terzi quite challenging. > > > > > >Gary > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- > > >From: "David Tayler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > >To: "lute-cs.dartmouth.edu" <[email protected]> > > >Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 11:14 PM > > >Subject: [LUTE] Re: lute is hard (was: mics arrived) > > > > > > > > > > It's all relative. > > > > I just think that the demands made on a professional lute player, and > > > > by that I mean someone who only plays concerts, > > > > no teaching, no job, etc--just concerts-- are less than a person in > > > > the same position on piano, organ, violin, cello, etc. > > > > > > > > For example, there are no lute pieces remotely comparable in > > > > difficulty to the transcendental etudes. Not to mention extended > > > > techniques, which are commonplace on the recorder. > > > > > > > > Personally, I find renaissance music just as difficult or more > > > > difficult than baroque music, and here I am speaking about not only > > > > the big pieces that are rarely if ever played, such as the Francecso > > > > "Song of the Birds," but also the high level ornaments in renaissance > > > > treatises that are routinely played by recorder and viol players--and > > > > especially cornetto players--but rarely used on the lute. These > > > > ornaments are I think comparable in difficulty to Weiss, though > > > > vastly different in style. > > > > Obviously the repertory is worlds apart, and in renaissance music the > > > > challenge is what is *not* written, just as it is in basso continuo. > > > > > > > > Another point of comparison is that it would be unacceptable even at > > > > the conservatory level to slow down the difficult bits, whereas this > > > > is often the case in renaissance and baroque performance--even in > > > > recordings. I also feel that lute music is meant to be more > > > > accessible, and that in Weiss and in the professional level ornaments > > > > of Ganassi, Bassano,etc, we see a degree of separation from that. > > > > > > > > I'm not saying that there are no lute pieces that are challenging, > > > > I'm just saying in all honesty > > > > I personally would have to work harder to have the equivalent > > > > income and opportunities on the piano. Maybe it shouldn't be that > > > > way...maybe I'm lucky it is. > > > > > > > > > > > > dt > > > > > > > > > > > > that's"At 05:26 PM 7/6/2007, you wrote: > > > > >Especially late Weiss. A piece of cake. > > > > > > > > > >ed > > > > > > > > > >At 07:38 PM 7/6/2007 -0400, Roman Turovsky wrote: > > > > > >Especially baroque. > > > > > >RT > > > > > > > > > > > >From: "David Tayler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >I really don't think the lute is particularly difficult.... :) > > > > > > > dt > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > At 07:00 AM 7/6/2007, you wrote: > > > > > > >>Lutes and guitars _are_ difficult instruments. Guitar pupil of > mine > > >of > > > > > > >>about > > > > > > >>12, doing well after three years of lessons, enjoying it and > > >studying > > > > > > >>regulary at home (!), performed his piece on this year's > > > > > pupils' night. He > > > > > > >>really did well, no obvious mistakes, played through the whole > piece > > > > > > >>without > > > > > > >>stopping, it was musical, he had some tone and volume. Afterward > his > > > > > > >>mother > > > > > > >>comes up to me: "Is that all?" She just started on piano and was > > > > > > >>disappointed with her son's result, as she's already doing much > > >better > > > > > > >>after > > > > > > >>the few lessons she's had. No wonder, try playing the opening of > > >Fuer > > > > > > >>Elise > > > > > > >>without piano lessons, my bet is you'll do fine. Try to do the > same > > >on a > > > > > > >>guitar, my bet is that it'll take several years to come anywhere > > >near the > > > > > > >>percieved perfection and easy of your first try on piano. A > piano > > >is, in > > > > > > >>the > > > > > > >>first stages, an on-off instrument, whereas on a guitar you'll > find > > >a > > > > > > >>miriad > > > > > > >>of near hits before the tone is even acceptable. A lute is even > > >harder to > > > > > > >>play with its double strings, lower string tension and akward > shape. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>Of course, piano music will be much more complicated for the > > >advanced > > > > > > >>student, so by that time it's a matter of different areas of > > >difficulty. > > > > > > >>And, obviously, the real test of mastering an instrument is > being > > >able to > > > > > > >>express yourself musically on it, not to play the difficult > pieces > > > > > > >>technically well, but that's not the argument here. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>David - cannot play beyond the opening phrase of Fuer Elise on > piano > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>**************************** > > > > > > >>David van Ooijen > > > > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >>www.davidvanooijen.nl > > > > > > >>**************************** > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >>To get on or off this list see list information at > > > > > > >>http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >_________________________________________________________________ > > > > > >Need personalized email and website? Look no further. It's easy > > > > > >with Doteasy $0 Web Hosting! Learn more at www.doteasy.com > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > > > > >No virus found in this incoming message. > > > > > >Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > > > >Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.0/887 - Release Date: > > >7/5/2007 > > > > > >1:55 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >Edward Martin > > > > >2817 East 2nd Street > > > > >Duluth, Minnesota 55812 > > > > >e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >voice: (218) 728-1202 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > > > Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.10.0/887 - Release Date: > 7/5/2007 > > >1:55 PM > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >-- > > >No virus found in this incoming message. > > >Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > >Version: 7.5.476 / Virus Database: 269.10.1/889 - Release Date: 7/6/2007 > > >8:00 PM > > > > > > > > Edward Martin > > 2817 East 2nd Street > > Duluth, Minnesota 55812 > > e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > voice: (218) 728-1202 > > > > > > > > > > -- > > No virus found in this incoming message. > > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > > Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.10.0/887 - Release Date: 7/5/2007 > 1:55 PM > > > > > > > > > -- > No virus found in this incoming message. > Checked by AVG Free Edition. > Version: 7.5.463 / Virus Database: 269.10.0/887 - Release Date: 7/5/2007 1:55 PM > >
