----- Original Message -----
From: "Ron Andrico" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

and the fact that the piece really needs reconstruction does not help the
matter.<

Needs reconstruction???? It lacks a rhythmic sign in ms. 4 and a chord at the end of ms. 20 in the facsimile, I would hardly call that "needs reconstruction"!

G.



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to