As I said, I wished to point out that the picture on pitch was far from simplistic even within one region. However I really don't think I should need, or indeed bother, to duplicate the journals and other published work on pitch - do you? MH
howard posner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Dec 7, 2007, at 11:57 PM, Martyn Hodgson wrote: > In some usages Rome pitch was considerably higher than current A440 This is tantalizing (assuming you're talking about 17th-century Rome). Where in Rome was pitch high? And who documented it? -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html --------------------------------- Support the World Aids Awareness campaign this month with Yahoo! for Good --
