At 06:36 PM 9/22/2008, Roman Turovsky wrote: >From: "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>on the former count, and the second simply is a reference to printed >>record. No, I have not called anybody a "liar". >You should also be careful not cause inference thereof.
I don't believe I had. If anybody took my initial note as some kind of indirect inference that I was branding people "liars", I would suggest the need to develop slightly thicker skin. The apparently dangerously controversial sentence from my original post: "Because original tablature versions of the Chilesotti book only appear to exist in occasionally-referenced, third-person rumors, I believe Paul O'Dette took a similar approach to his 'Ancient Airs' recording: re-intabulating from Chilesotti's staff-notation version." No reference to liars anywhere, and I have thoroughly (and now repeatedly) justified my use of this language. >Lutenet is not an ademic institution, and little mentioned here would >require peer review. This is both good and bad, as we are free to discuss >the Chilesotti papers debacle, while having to tolerate Doug Smith's Lute >History. We are in agreement on the former point. Having never actually read the latter (and sincerely interested in maintaining more friendship than enmity), I have no comment on the latter. Best, Eugene To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
