From: "Eugene C. Braig IV" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Lutenet is not an ademic institution, and little mentioned here would
require peer review. This is both good and bad, as we are free to discuss
the Chilesotti papers debacle, while having to tolerate Doug Smith's Lute
History.
We are in agreement on the former point. Having never actually read the
latter (and sincerely interested in maintaining more friendship than
enmity), I have no comment on the latter.
Best,
Eugene
It is not obligatory.
However it would be logical and nice to apply the same standard of
recensional peerage or lack thereof on all scholarly types among the lutenet
denizens.
RT
To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
