Minutes ago, Eugene wrote

> Regarding 4th-tuned, gut-strung,
> lute-like types (like those used by Vivaldi, Scarlatti, Arrigoni, etc.), I'm
> not aware of anything specific written on technique until the late 1760s
> when the by-then-old-fashioned instrument was only mentioned as a side note
> in methods written more for the 5th-tuned, wire-strung Neapolitan type and
> plectrum technique.
..
> ...And all these methods are looking forward to a growing classical
> aesthetic rather than back to the baroque.
..
> To me, iconography and some music at least imply that punteado technique
> dominated under a late baroque aesthetic (like the sonatas of Arrigoni that
> feature some chords/double stops and pedal passages that skip courses) and
> that quills came to be more commonplace under a developing "classical"
> aesthetic
..
> Earlier iconography varies quite a bit, but almost always depicting what
> appears to me to be punteado and most often depicting thumb out.  Pinkies
> seem to be planted or not.  I play thumb out, no plant--almost
> guitar-like--but I tend to take scalar passages alternating p-i (rather than
> the more guitar-like i-m).

Interesting to see 'mostly-down' already in early classical music.

So, Vivaldi on a four-course, 'violin-tuned' mandolin might be played
with fingers in stead of quill? Then p-i seems the way to go. If quil,
up-down seems logical. Am I right?
But I might also summarize for Vivaldi: anything goes, we don't really know?

Another thing today's mandoline was playing was Castaldi duets with
theorbo. Arranged, obviously. Here fingers or up-don seems more
appropriate? The chords with quill were a bit unconvincing.

David - drinking from the fountain of knowledge, i.e. the Lute List!


-- 
*******************************
David van Ooijen
[email protected]
www.davidvanooijen.nl
*******************************



To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to