You did get a bit lost. Roman suggested that an engraving shows Falkenhagen with an angelique. I wanted to know if there was any evidence connecting Falkenhagen to the angelique, because Falkenhagen would not have posed for an engraving with the angelique if he didn't play it. He would have posed with the instrument on which he made his reputation.
On Jul 14, 2009, at 11:14 AM, David Tayler wrote: > He didn't play the baroque lute? He studied with Weiss, as I recall > and played other instruments including the harpsichord. Is there more > than one Falckenhagen? > Besides, it still is "single from double" > > Still confused > dt > > > At 07:36 AM 7/14/2009, you wrote: >> On Jul 14, 2009, at 6:11 AM, Roman Turovsky wrote: >> >>>> Pardon my ignorance again, but is there any reason to connect >>>> Falkenhagen with the angelique? Did he write any music for it? >>>> Does >>>> any source mention him and the angelique? >>> Why would that matter? >> >> Because he would not have sat for an engraving with an instrument he >> didn't play. -- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
