I'm assuming you are referring to the concertos and the trios, which form the majority of his output, in particular Op 3. Are these all for Angelique? dt
At 12:01 PM 7/14/2009, you wrote: >You did get a bit lost. Roman suggested that an engraving shows >Falkenhagen with an angelique. I wanted to know if there was any >evidence connecting Falkenhagen to the angelique, because Falkenhagen >would not have posed for an engraving with the angelique if he didn't >play it. He would have posed with the instrument on which he made >his reputation. > >On Jul 14, 2009, at 11:14 AM, David Tayler wrote: > > > He didn't play the baroque lute? He studied with Weiss, as I recall > > and played other instruments including the harpsichord. Is there more > > than one Falckenhagen? > > Besides, it still is "single from double" > > > > Still confused > > dt > > > > > > At 07:36 AM 7/14/2009, you wrote: > >> On Jul 14, 2009, at 6:11 AM, Roman Turovsky wrote: > >> > >>>> Pardon my ignorance again, but is there any reason to connect > >>>> Falkenhagen with the angelique? Did he write any music for it? > >>>> Does > >>>> any source mention him and the angelique? > >>> Why would that matter? > >> > >> Because he would not have sat for an engraving with an instrument he > >> didn't play. > > >-- > >To get on or off this list see list information at >http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
