Dear all, while I agree with everyone that the C-part is good to be repeated, I would be very careful in saying anything about what "Dowlnand's intentions" really were... ;-)
Arto On Sat, 30 Apr 2011 13:21:31 -0700 (PDT), Christopher Wilke <[email protected]> wrote: > Denys, > > --- On Sat, 4/30/11, Denys Stephens <[email protected]> wrote: > >> And >> as an aside, why would the solo versions contain divisions >> on the >> third strain if it was only played once? > > > Interestingly, the Galliard to Lachrimae has no divisions on the third > strain, but... > > >> There's absolutely >> no >> doubt in my mind that the repeat was intended by Dowland. >> > > I agree. > > Chris > > Christopher Wilke > Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer > www.christopherwilke.com > > > >> Best wishes, >> >> Denys >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] >> [mailto:[email protected]] >> On Behalf >> Of [email protected] >> Sent: 30 April 2011 01:00 >> To: lute-cs.dartmouth.edu >> Subject: [LUTE] Flow my tears >> >> Hi, everyone! I may be taking my life in my hands (in the >> sense of >> inviting a deluge of emails), but what the heck. What are >> people's >> opinions regarding a repeat in performance of the third >> section of >> Dowland's "Flow My Tears"; yes, no, and why? >> >> >> >> To get on or off this list see list information at >> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html >> >> >>
