I'm afraid you missed the principal subject in the question I asked. To
   paraphrase it:  what do we reasonably know about what sounds the
   composer (and audience) expect to hear when the music was performed?
   MH
   --- On Sat, 2/7/11, Christopher Wilke <[email protected]> wrote:

     From: Christopher Wilke <[email protected]>
     Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: What's the point to 'historical sound'
     To: [email protected], "Ron Andrico" <[email protected]>,
     "Martyn Hodgson" <[email protected]>
     Date: Saturday, 2 July, 2011, 13:12

   Martyn,
      Very simple answers.  Composers expected money/food/lodging in
   exchange for whatever music his (almost always his) patron desired.
   Audiences expected to be pleased.
   Chris
   Christopher Wilke
   Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
   www.christopherwilke.com
   --- On Sat, 7/2/11, Martyn Hodgson <[1][email protected]>
   wrote:
   > From: Martyn Hodgson <[2][email protected]>
   > Subject: [LUTE] Re: What's the point to 'historical sound'
   > To: [3][email protected], "Ron Andrico"
   <[4][email protected]>
   > Date: Saturday, July 2, 2011, 7:10 AM
   >
   >
   >    All this is no excuse to ignore what
   > evidence there actually is about
   >    what early composers, and their
   > audiences, expected.
   >
   >    --- On Sat, 2/7/11, Ron Andrico <[5][email protected]>
   > wrote:
   >
   >      From: Ron Andrico <[6][email protected]>
   >      Subject: [LUTE] Re: What's the
   > point to 'historical sound'
   >      To: [7][email protected],
   > [8][email protected]
   >      Date: Saturday, 2 July, 2011,
   > 11:55
   >
   >       To Martyn & All:
   >       My point is, while we may try to
   > recreate sounds of the past, we are
   >       constrained by the parameters of the
   > present.  Echoing Arto's idea,
   >    the
   >       'truth' of what we hear is here and
   > now.  I would prefer to immerse
   >       myself in the contextual evidence and
   > damn the realities of modern
   >       performing constraints - except I like
   > playing on strings that are
   >       possible to tune.
   >       Ron Andrico
   >       > Date: Sat, 2 Jul 2011 08:27:07
   > +0100
   >       > To: [1][9][email protected]
   >       > From: [2][10][email protected]
   >       > Subject: [LUTE] What's the point
   > to 'historical sound'
   >       >
   >       >
   >       >
   >       > Ron Andrico writes: 'This whole
   > archlute episode brings up an
   >       > important point: At some point,
   > we have to admit that we are not
   >       trying
   >       > to re-create an historical
   > sound.'
   >       >
   >       > There are a number of
   > difficulties with this view of which the
   >       > principal is that the original
   > composer created the work with
   >       > particular sounds in mind (tho'
   > of course this might vary so that,
   >       for
   >       > example, pieces could sometimes
   > be rescored to better fit local
   >       > conditions). Who are we to say
   > the composer was wrong?
   >       >
   >       > The whole thrust of 'period
   > performance' is to try and escape from
   >       the
   >       > blinkered cavalier (self-centred)
   > approach adopted in the early
   >    years
   >       > of the movement and to focus on
   > trying to achieve something closer
   >    to
   >       > what the 'Old Ones' might
   > actually have heard. Personally I'd draw
   >       the
   >       > line at castrati - but accidents
   > can happen.......
   >       >
   >       > MH
   >       >
   >       > MH
   >       >
   >       >
   >       >
   >       >
   >       > --
   >       >
   >       >
   >       > To get on or off this list see
   > list information at
   >       > [3][11]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >       --
   >
   >    --
   >
   > References
   >
   >    1.
   [12]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   >    2.
   [13]http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   .uk
   >    3. [14]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >
   >

   --

References

   1. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   2. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   3. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   4. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   5. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   6. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   7. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   8. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
   9. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  10. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  11. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  12. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  13. http://uk.mc263.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected]
  14. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to