On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 15:53:30 +0000, Ron Andrico wrote
> Hello Monica:
>    Besard's 1617 book was rather inelegantly engraved.  He may have used
>    the services of a chimpanzee, which explains a great deal.
>    Ron Andrico

Sorry, and I might be completely off here, but IIRC Besard 1617 was
neither engraved nor typeset - it's a woodcut.  But I think that only
partially explains the problems in that print.  While there are a lot
of errors that can be explained by the impossibility to correct errors
(letters being on the wrong line etc.) there are a _lot_ of errors
that can't be explained by this, like the ensemble parts not matching
harmonically or having non-matching length.

> As far as the music is concerned it seems Besard was   not   
> a professional musician.

Whatever "professional musician" means in that time.  I think we need
to be very careful with such statements - ur inability the
read/interpret the original text might be just that: _our_
inanbility. May I mention the fact that Robert Dowland found Besard
worthy (and professional) enough to translate his lute instructions?

Cheers, Ralf Mattes

16 Aug 2011 16:42:40 +0100
>    > To: [email protected]
>    > CC: [email protected]
>    > From: [email protected]
>    > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Besard duets once more
>    >
>    > I know how to fix it:
>    > > rewrite it, and some of you send me their fixes when I last asked
>    > > about Besard last year (was it?). But looking at the music, 
> it begs   > > the question: why? Why so many errors and/or poor 
> writing, why   bother   > > to publish it? Is there a theory out 
> there, someone?   >   > I am not very familiar with this particular 
> source but it doesn't   surprise   > me that it is apparently a 
> mess. I can think of a number of baroque   guitar   > tablatures 
> which are pretty useless. Have you ever looked at Pesori?.   > And 
> then there is Dalza.   > Have you read Martin shepherd's article 
> "Was Dalza really weird?"   >   > There are fairly obvious practical 
> reasons why there might be a large   number   > of   > printing 
> errors. As far as the music is concerned it seems Besard was   not   
> > a professional musician. A bad case of vanity publishing. Is the book
>    > engraved or printed from type?
>    >
>    > Monica
>    >
>    > >
>    > > --
>    > > *******************************
>    > > David van Ooijen
>    > > [email protected]
>    > > www.davidvanooijen.nl
>    > > *******************************
>    > >
>    > >
>    > >
>    > > To get on or off this list see list information at
>    > > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>    >
>    >
> 
>    --


--
R. Mattes -
Hochschule fuer Musik Freiburg
[email protected]


Reply via email to