Thank you!
regards
David

Sent from my iPhone

On Aug 27, 2011, at 10:10 AM, howard posner <[email protected]> wrote:

> On Aug 27, 2011, at 7:12 AM, Stephen Stubbs wrote:
> 
>> Just another example of the Social Justice experiment still going on in USA.
>> 
>> Basically,
>> 
>> Corporations are Bad.
>> Social Justice is Good.
>> 
>> The last major Social Justice experiment made it all the way into the USA 
>> Constitution as the 18th Amendment, (the Prohibition Amendment making it 
>> very difficult to obtain alcoholic beverages legally) on January 17, 1920.
>> 
>> It took the 21st Amendment on December 5, 1933 to repeal the 18th Amendment.
>> 
>> I don't expect the irrational experiments being done by the current Attorney 
>> General of the USA (Eric Holder) to continue after the next President and 
>> Congress take office in January 2013.
>> "The Other" Stephen Stubbs
>> Champaign, IL
> 
> 
> I hate to burst your bubble when you've obviously been saving up this little 
> Republican bumper sticker for the right moment to plaster it on the lute 
> list, but you got the subject wrong: this is about actions to enforce an 
> international treaty by the U. S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Interior 
> Department) and Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Department of Homeland 
> Security).  It's the second time in a couple of years that Gibson has been 
> raided on suspicion of using wood from protected species.
> 
> It has nothing to do with the Attorney General, the Democratic Party, 
> corporations, or social justice (neither did Prohibition, which was an 
> attempt to enforce morality; social justice legislation would be something 
> like the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which is still in effect, even in rural 
> Illinois, regardless of whether it's considered untoward government 
> interference to tell a business that it can't exclude customers because of 
> their skin color).  
> 
> The documentation issue is a difficult one.  On the one hand, draconian, 
> inflexible enforcement is unfair.  On the other hand, if enforcement 
> authorities don't demand rigorous documentation it's far too easy to smuggle 
> illegal substances.  This would defeat the purpose of environmental 
> protection treaties, which are understood to be important by everyone in the 
> world except members of the Republican Party in the USA.  I have owned 
> pre-CITES  instruments made of woods that have since been protected (my 
> charango made of elephant-tusk ivory, strung with Barbary Sheep gut, in an 
> rhinoceros-skin case lined with otter fur, comes to mind).  In the course of 
> trying to sell a rosewood instrument a few months ago I made a point of 
> telling potential buyers there could be problems taking it across borders.  A 
> couple of overseas buyers expressed interest and then disappeared; I don't 
> whether the CITES problems scared them away.  Sometimes we are inconvenienced 
> by concerns (such as biod!
 iv!
> ersity and deforestation) more important than our own little problems.
> 
> Anyway, if you really needed to offer an off-topic political rant, you should 
> have saved it for a time when it was actually a propos of the subject.  I'm 
> going back to my morning coffee.  You enjoy your tea party.
> 
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html


Reply via email to