Dear Roman, Have I missed something? What precisely is the evidence that Brescianello (named on the first page) did not write the works in the Dresden MS? Moreover, the style of these is quite different to the extant works under Schiffelholz's name.
rgds Martyn --- On Mon, 3/10/11, Roman Turovsky <[email protected]> wrote: From: Roman Turovsky <[email protected]> Subject: [LUTE] Re: mandora/gallichon music (and something modern) To: "Lute Net" <[email protected]>, "Stuart Walsh" <[email protected]>, "Martyn Hodgson" <[email protected]> Date: Monday, 3 October, 2011, 10:56 I think by now it should be clear that Brescianello (a 1st-rate composer) wrote no M/G music, and his name graces the Schiffelholz papers for all the wrong reasons. RT ----- Original Message ----- From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[1][email protected]> To: "Lute Net" <[2][email protected]>; "Stuart Walsh" <[3][email protected]>; "Roman Turovsky" <[4][email protected]> Sent: Monday, October 03, 2011 5:42 AM Subject: [LUTE] Re: mandora/gallichon music (and something modern) > > Ha! ha! Roman. > > I recall from some years ago that you're not keen on B - don't quite > know why tho'. Whilst not being a towering genius his solo works > generally seem a cut above the vast bulk of M/G repertoire. > > But re S: his music seems so typical of many M/G works - very > pedestrian. Indeed almost as much as the myriad of (amateur?) pieces > found in numerous M/G sources - but I guess you don't agree. > > Best wishes to you > > Martyn > --- On Mon, 3/10/11, Roman Turovsky <[5][email protected]> wrote: > > From: Roman Turovsky <[6][email protected]> > Subject: Re: [LUTE] Re: mandora/gallichon music (and something > modern) > To: "Lute Net" <[7][email protected]>, "Stuart Walsh" > <[8][email protected]>, "Martyn Hodgson" <[9][email protected]> > Date: Monday, 3 October, 2011, 10:32 > > From: "Martyn Hodgson" <[1][10][email protected]> > > pretty undemanding and also, alas, much is of poor quality. However > the > > Brescianello is, of course, good > You meant Schiffelholz, of course (and the quality is a matter of > dispute...). > RT > > -- > > References > > 1. > [11]http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] .uk > > > To get on or off this list see list information at > [12]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html -- References 1. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] 2. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] 3. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] 4. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] 5. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] 6. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] 7. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] 8. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] 9. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] 10. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] 11. http://us.mc817.mail.yahoo.com/mc/[email protected] 12. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
