Well, if you can't join 'em, just beat it.
   CW
   Dr. Christopher Wilke D.M.A.
   Music Faculty
   Nazareth College, Rochester, NY
   State University of New York at Geneseo
   Lutenist, Guitarist and Composer
   www.christopherwilke.com
   --- On Mon, 3/12/12, Roman Turovsky <[email protected]> wrote:

     From: Roman Turovsky <[email protected]>
     Subject: [LUTE] Re: Saturday quotes
     To: "William Samson" <[email protected]>, "Lute List"
     <[email protected]>
     Date: Monday, March 12, 2012, 8:35 AM

   I was referring to the Mark Wheeler's theatrical approach to lute, with
   moonwalks and hosiery.
   RT
   ----- Original Message -----
   From: "William Samson" <[1][email protected]>
   To: "Lute List" <[2][email protected]>
   Sent: Monday, March 12, 2012 4:34 AM
   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Saturday quotes
   >
   >   RE Michael Jackson - I think it's the zombie look you get from
   spending
   >   too much time in solitary practice and losing your grip on reality.
   >   We've all been there, I suspect.  The tricky part, though, is the
   dance
   >   moves . . .
   >
   >   Bill
   >   From: Gary Digman <[3][email protected]>
   >   To: [4][email protected]
   >   Sent: Monday, 12 March 2012, 7:23
   >   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Saturday quotes
   >   The "Michael Jackson" approach? Hanging the lute over the balcony
   >   railing?
   >   Playing with one hand in a glove?
   >   Gary
   >   ----- Original Message -----
   >   From: "Roman Turovsky" <[1][5][email protected]>
   >   To: "Mark Wheeler" <[2][6][email protected]>; "Ron Andrico"
   >   <[3][7][email protected]>
   >   Cc: <[4][8][email protected]>
   >   Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 8:06 AM
   >   Subject: [LUTE] Re: Saturday quotes
   >   > Which sounds like an excuse for certain "Michael Jackson"
   approach to
   >   > Early
   >   > Music.
   >   >
   >   > Unrewarding, both visually and musically.
   >   > RT
   >   >
   >   >
   >   >
   >   > ----- Original Message -----
   >   > From: "Mark Wheeler" <[5][9][email protected]>
   >   > To: "Ron Andrico" <[6][10][email protected]>
   >   > Cc: <[7][11][email protected]>
   >   > Sent: Sunday, March 11, 2012 9:08 AM
   >   > Subject: [LUTE] Re: Saturday quotes
   >   >
   >   >
   >   >> Reading this I can't help but feel that you are pressing for an
   >   aesthetic
   >   >> that is more a reaction to our modern world than one that
   reflects a
   >   >> possible 16th century cultural atmosphere....
   >   >>
   >   >> Check out this excellent article by Liz Kenny...
   >   >> "The uses of lute song: texts, contexts and pretexts for
   >   aEUR~historically
   >   >> informed' performance" Early Music 2008/02
   >   >>
   >   >> Here us a bit of the opening..
   >   >>
   >   >> "Our enthusiasm for printed sources has obscured other ways of
   >   >> approaching
   >   >> these songs, and has artificially divided them from the songs of
   the
   >   next
   >   >> generation. What looks like a perfect balance on paper may or
   may
   >   not
   >   >> have
   >   >> remained so when the songs were performed, and the seductive
   >   solitude
   >   >> evoked by a book to be kept and treasured at home may not have
   >   always
   >   >> represented composer aEUR~intentions', if indeed we can separate
   >   these from
   >   >> performer intentions. The aEUR~miniaturist aesthetic' of
   privacy,
   >   secrecy and
   >   >> the aEUR~esoteric' often define this repertory.
   aEUR~Iconographical
   >   >> representations of the lute in performance of instrumental or
   vocal
   >   music
   >   >> ... consist- ently depict a theatre of privacy and solitude ...
   >   apart (or
   >   >> distanced) from public, courtly culture.' This may have been
   true of
   >   one
   >   >> group of performersaEUR"the most iconogenicaEUR"but it ignores
   what
   >   others were
   >   >> doing in other contexts, very definitely in public."
   >   >>
   >   >> The end (with lots of interesting stuff in-between....)
   >   >>
   >   >> "Early 17th-century musicians faced a challenge which their
   modern
   >   >> descendents have no trouble recognizing: that of adjusting their
   >   personal
   >   >> creative ambitions to different sorts of audience or consumer
   >   demand.
   >   >> This
   >   >> is not compatible with a philosophy of one aEUR~right' or even
   one
   >   generally
   >   >> preferable style of modern performance based on a careful
   sifting of
   >   his-
   >   >> torical evidence, if the sift eliminates evidence incom- patible
   >   with any
   >   >> single interpretative thesis. Modern ideas of aEUR~public' and
   >   aEUR~private' are
   >   >> not always helpful: traces of 17th- century public practice are
   to
   >   be
   >   >> found in privately circulated manuscripts, while widely
   available
   >   printed
   >   >> books facilitated solitary music- reading. To illuminate this
   >   repertory
   >   >> from scholarly angles we need not a normative musicology but a
   more
   >   >> cheerfully disruptive one: we might then use its tools to
   sharpen a
   >   new
   >   >> set of interpretive skills. As Robert Spencer said aEUR~I see
   >   nothing
   >   >> upsetting in that' "
   >   >>
   >   >> All the best
   >   >> Mark
   >   >>
   >   >> www.pantagruel.de
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >> On Mar 10, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Ron Andrico wrote:
   >   >>
   >   >>>  We have posted our Saturday quotes on performing lute songs
   with
   >   no
   >   >>>  gimmicks:
   >   >>>  [1][8][12]http://wp.me/p15OyV-lv
   >   >>>  Ron & Donna
   >   >>>
   >   >>>  --
   >   >>>
   >   >>> References
   >   >>>
   >   >>>  1. [9][13]http://wp.me/p15OyV-lv
   >   >>>
   >   >>>
   >   >>> To get on or off this list see list information at
   >   >>> [10][14]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >>
   >   >
   >   >
   >   -------------------------------------------------------------------
   ----
   >   ---------
   >   No virus found in this incoming message.
   >   Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
   >   Version: 9.0.927 / Virus Database: 271.1.1/4264 - Release Date:
   >   03/11/12
   >   00:34:00
   >
   >   --
   >
   > References
   >
   >   1. mailto:[15][email protected]
   >   2. mailto:[16][email protected]
   >   3. mailto:[17][email protected]
   >   4. mailto:[18][email protected]
   >   5. mailto:[19][email protected]
   >   6. mailto:[20][email protected]
   >   7. mailto:[21][email protected]
   >   8. [22]http://wp.me/p15OyV-lv
   >   9. [23]http://wp.me/p15OyV-lv
   >  10. [24]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >
   >

   --

References

   1. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
   2. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
   3. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
   4. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
   5. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
   6. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
   7. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
   8. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
   9. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
  10. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
  11. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
  12. http://wp.me/p15OyV-lv
  13. http://wp.me/p15OyV-lv
  14. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  15. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
  16. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
  17. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
  18. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
  19. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
  20. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
  21. file://localhost/mc/[email protected]
  22. http://wp.me/p15OyV-lv
  23. http://wp.me/p15OyV-lv
  24. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to