We have a coincidence here, so I'll expand on what Roman and Ned have
   written, and combine the subjects of two recent postings here: "Re: Ms
   4022" and "Bartolomiej Pekiel."  The topics have much in common, since
   Ms 4022 is the one Roman calls "The Danzig Manuscript," with pieces
   sometimes erroneously attributed to Pekiel.



   Ms 4022 now in Berlin was one of two lute manuscripts in the
   Stadtbibliothek in Danzig (Gdansk) before WW_II (see the stamp at the
   bottom of the first page).  (The other is Ms 4021.)  They were long
   reported to have been destroyed during the war. Recently Ms 4022 (and
   Ms 4021?) turned up in a small archive in Germany, perhaps brought
   there when Germans were expelled from Danzig at the end of the war.
   Recently they seem to have been given over to the Staatsbibliothek zu
   Berlin, retaining their old call numbers.



   Ms. 4022 probably dates from the first or second decade of the 17th
   century, and has an east European repertory, as some of you have
   noticed, including German, French, Italian and English works. Some
   titles are familiar, e.g, La Monica, Pavan d'Espagna, Heydruken Tanz,
   Baletto Rutteno (!), Allemande d'Amour, Rolandt, Spagnoletta, Parlament
   of Englandt, Duda, (a bagpipes piece) and intabulations of German
   secular and sacred Lieder (many by Hans Leo Hassler).  The named
   composers are familiar: Ballard, V.B. (Bakfark?), Perrichon, Piccinini,
   Nani di Milano, Gaultier, Mercure, et al.  (Some titles and
   attributions were trimmed away during binding.)

   The pieces on folios 20-32 (etc.) have obtained some notoriety, so to
   speak.  And the current New Grove online perpetuates the confusion.
   Some 40 lute dances are identified solely with the initials "B.P." in
   the margin. To some this suggested Bartolomeij Pekiel (d. ca. 1670), a
   composer little known in the west.  Polish musicians consider Pekiel
   one of the truly "great" Polish composers of the early baroque, a well
   deserved reputation, judging from the quality of his music.  He
   specialized almost entirely in sacred music, written in the polychoral
   Venetian concertante style of composers like the Gabrielis: works for
   large choral, solo and instrumental forces. A nice selection of his
   sacred music is Polish Baroque: Pekiel and Contemporaries with the
   Ensemble Euopeen Wm. Byrd, Graham O'Reilly, cond. (Ambronay CD #010).



   Well, the "B.P."  attribution stuck to Pekiel, and accordingly the
   pieces made their way into a critical series of "monuments" of Polish
   music,

   Maria Szczepanska, ed., Bartolomiej Pekiel: 40 utworow na lutniea
   [="Bart. Pekiel: 40 pieces for lute"],  in Wydawnicto Dawnej Muzuki
   Polskej, vol. 30. [Krakow]: Polskie wydawnictwo muzyczne, 1955.

   I own Stanley Buetens's well worn personal copy of this publication.
   Stanley undoubtedly drew from it for the anthology from which Ned made
   his nice recording. [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v'X65jfhUcg



   There are a number of problems with the attribution.  Pekiel began
   working as a professional in 1631, which suggests a birth date around
   1610.  In that case he would have been a child when the pieces were
   copied into the Danzig Manuscript.  Accordingly the Pekiel lute edition
   was withdrawn by the publishers and vol. 30 was replaced with what is
   surely the correct resolution of B.P., Polish Dance, "Baletto
   Polacco":

   Zofia Steszewska, ed., Tance polskie z Tabulatury gdanskiej (I po. XVII
   w.): na lutnie. Ibid., 1965.

   It is nice to have Ms 4022 available on line.  The music is worthy of
   your attention.

   [2]http://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/dms/werkansicht/?PPN=PPN61
   8787879&PHYSID=PHYS_0001



   AJN



   --

References

   1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v%C2%B4X65jfhUcg
   2. 
http://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/dms/werkansicht/?PPN=PPN618787879&PHYSID=PHYS_0001


To get on or off this list see list information at
http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to