Thank you, Mr. Ness, for weighing in and helping (along with Roman) to clear 
away some of the confusion surrounding this interesting - and apparently quite 
fine - composer, Bartolomiej Pekiel.

Ned
On Apr 7, 2012, at 1:35 PM, A. J. Ness wrote:

>   We have a coincidence here, so I'll expand on what Roman and Ned have
>   written, and combine the subjects of two recent postings here: "Re: Ms
>   4022" and "Bartolomiej Pekiel."  The topics have much in common, since
>   Ms 4022 is the one Roman calls "The Danzig Manuscript," with pieces
>   sometimes erroneously attributed to Pekiel.
> 
> 
> 
>   Ms 4022 now in Berlin was one of two lute manuscripts in the
>   Stadtbibliothek in Danzig (Gdansk) before WW_II (see the stamp at the
>   bottom of the first page).  (The other is Ms 4021.)  They were long
>   reported to have been destroyed during the war. Recently Ms 4022 (and
>   Ms 4021?) turned up in a small archive in Germany, perhaps brought
>   there when Germans were expelled from Danzig at the end of the war.
>   Recently they seem to have been given over to the Staatsbibliothek zu
>   Berlin, retaining their old call numbers.
> 
> 
> 
>   Ms. 4022 probably dates from the first or second decade of the 17th
>   century, and has an east European repertory, as some of you have
>   noticed, including German, French, Italian and English works. Some
>   titles are familiar, e.g, La Monica, Pavan d'Espagna, Heydruken Tanz,
>   Baletto Rutteno (!), Allemande d'Amour, Rolandt, Spagnoletta, Parlament
>   of Englandt, Duda, (a bagpipes piece) and intabulations of German
>   secular and sacred Lieder (many by Hans Leo Hassler).  The named
>   composers are familiar: Ballard, V.B. (Bakfark?), Perrichon, Piccinini,
>   Nani di Milano, Gaultier, Mercure, et al.  (Some titles and
>   attributions were trimmed away during binding.)
> 
>   The pieces on folios 20-32 (etc.) have obtained some notoriety, so to
>   speak.  And the current New Grove online perpetuates the confusion.
>   Some 40 lute dances are identified solely with the initials "B.P." in
>   the margin. To some this suggested Bartolomeij Pekiel (d. ca. 1670), a
>   composer little known in the west.  Polish musicians consider Pekiel
>   one of the truly "great" Polish composers of the early baroque, a well
>   deserved reputation, judging from the quality of his music.  He
>   specialized almost entirely in sacred music, written in the polychoral
>   Venetian concertante style of composers like the Gabrielis: works for
>   large choral, solo and instrumental forces. A nice selection of his
>   sacred music is Polish Baroque: Pekiel and Contemporaries with the
>   Ensemble Euopeen Wm. Byrd, Graham O'Reilly, cond. (Ambronay CD #010).
> 
> 
> 
>   Well, the "B.P."  attribution stuck to Pekiel, and accordingly the
>   pieces made their way into a critical series of "monuments" of Polish
>   music,
> 
>   Maria Szczepanska, ed., Bartolomiej Pekiel: 40 utworow na lutniea
>   [="Bart. Pekiel: 40 pieces for lute"],  in Wydawnicto Dawnej Muzuki
>   Polskej, vol. 30. [Krakow]: Polskie wydawnictwo muzyczne, 1955.
> 
>   I own Stanley Buetens's well worn personal copy of this publication.
>   Stanley undoubtedly drew from it for the anthology from which Ned made
>   his nice recording. [1]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v'X65jfhUcg
> 
> 
> 
>   There are a number of problems with the attribution.  Pekiel began
>   working as a professional in 1631, which suggests a birth date around
>   1610.  In that case he would have been a child when the pieces were
>   copied into the Danzig Manuscript.  Accordingly the Pekiel lute edition
>   was withdrawn by the publishers and vol. 30 was replaced with what is
>   surely the correct resolution of B.P., Polish Dance, "Baletto
>   Polacco":
> 
>   Zofia Steszewska, ed., Tance polskie z Tabulatury gdanskiej (I po. XVII
>   w.): na lutnie. Ibid., 1965.
> 
>   It is nice to have Ms 4022 available on line.  The music is worthy of
>   your attention.
> 
>   [2]http://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/dms/werkansicht/?PPN=PPN61
>   8787879&PHYSID=PHYS_0001
> 
> 
> 
>   AJN
> 
> 
> 
>   --
> 
> References
> 
>   1. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v%C2%B4X65jfhUcg
>   2. 
> http://digital.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/dms/werkansicht/?PPN=PPN618787879&PHYSID=PHYS_0001
> 
> 
> To get on or off this list see list information at
> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html



Reply via email to