It was a reply to David's post (below). Notice that he mentions sharing costs 
which is definately reasonable. Photocopying is a work which has to be paid, 
however I have a feeling that sooner or later probably most of interesting 
manuscripts will be digitalised. We only discuss how it could be done.

jl


Wiadomo¶æ napisana przez Alan Hoyle w dniu 26 kwi 2012, o godz. 22:17:

> I do agree in principle with such sentiments, but, as Donna Stewart (a 
> librarian as well as a supreme interpreter of renaissance music for voice) 
> explained on the net a few months ago, the photographing (not to mention the 
> year-on-year conserving of these manuscripts, along with other aspects of 
> their management) costs an increasingly large amount of money - and at a time 
> when economic/fiscal pressures of public funds seem to be tightening focus on 
> what will bring a 'useful' financial return.
>  
> Since, as lutenists, we have perversely chosen a non-commercial passion to 
> pursue, we should not expect the world to leap in and pander to it. We are 
> hugely fortunate already with the amount of tablature available for free via 
> Fronimo, Django & other sources. it ill behoves us to complain if a library 
> requires a contribution to its running costs to have access to its 
> manuscripts. Of course, if they find they can give it for free - so much the 
> better!
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
>  
> 2012/4/26 Jaros³aw Lipski <[email protected]>
> Hear, hear! Absolutely, manuscripts should be in the public domain and easily 
> available (at least in future).
> 
> jl
> 
> 
> Wiadomo¶æ napisana przez David Tayler w dniu 26 kwi 2012, o godz. 02:38:
> 
> >   Since I'm a hippie and believe all music should be free, some good must
> >   come from this.
> >   However, since I run a group and believe people should be paid, why
> >   don't you set up a PayPal donation event and I will be happy to chip
> >   in. And I imagine others would as well.
> >   I have often paid for mss to be scanned at libraries, knowing full well
> >   that others would benefit from these mss being "bumped" to the head of
> >   the inevitable line, to quote Dr. Blow.
> >   All mss will be scanned, of course. Only when? I just wish it had all
> >   been sooner before I ruined my eyes in the microfilm booth.
> >   However, I think it would be nice to share the cost.
> >   dt
> >
> >   --
> >
> >
> > To get on or off this list see list information at
> > http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 


--

Reply via email to