That is terrible, Albert. You have my sympathy. They used you.

I look forward to reading Francois' introduction to the Tree edition!

Rob MacKillop

www.robmackillop.net 

On 25 Apr 2012, at 21:48, Albert Reyerman <[email protected]> wrote:

> The Singakademie 4060 manuscript has been set on the net
> cause TREE EDITION paied for the scanning of the source
> (some hundreds of Euros).
> 
> I received the Scans from Berlin in high resolution
> two weeks ago and now they set this source to the net.
> Not very kind.
> 
> A printed publication is in preparation with intro and
> concordances by Francois Pierre Goy.
> 
> Regards
> Albert Reyerman
> 
> TREE  EDITION
> Albert Reyerman
> Finkenberg 89
> 23558 Luebeck
> Germany
> [email protected]
> www.Tree-Edition.com
> ++49(0)451 899 78 48
> 
> More Music Books at
> http://tree-edition.magix.net/public/
> 
> 
> Am 25.04.2012 21:34, schrieb Andreas Schlegel:
>> Dear lute netters,
>> 
>> That's the famous manuscript of the Singakademie who came back from Kiew in 
>> the year 2000. I bought a microfiche and in February I was in Berlin, made 
>> the physical description and took photos of the watermarks etc. - and they 
>> didn't told me that they will publish the PDF...
>> 
>> But anyway: That's a great gift! A big thank you to the library and to 
>> Rainer who shared the link!
>> 
>> François-Pierre Goy and Tim Crawford are working on this very important 
>> source. François-Pierre Goy wrote an article and a whole inventory - but I 
>> don't know where it will be published. I will ask him when he's back from 
>> his holiday.
>> 
>> Enjoy the source!
>> 
>> Andreas
>> 
>> Am 25.04.2012 um 21:07 schrieb Rainer:
>> 
>>> Dear lute netters,
>>> 
>>> I have no idea if this is new:
>>> 
>>> MS 4060 (750 pages) is on-line.
>>> 
>>> See
>>> 
>>>    http://resolver.staatsbibliothek-berlin.de/SBB000078A300000000
>>> 
>>> Rainer adS
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> To get on or off this list see list information at
>>> http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> .
>> 
> 
> 
> 


Reply via email to