Hello Ed: I'm not sure about the 'someone famous' bit but I reconstructed the missing two measures and published a neat two-page version in an LSA Quarterly circa 2000. Maybe someone famous and organized can give you a better citation. I'm amused when people play corrupt pieces without fixing the obvious mistakes, it's like my friends who copy fiddle tunes from old 78 rpm recordings and play them exactly as recorded, even adding scratches, pops and surface noise. RA > Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 17:04:21 +0900 > To: [email protected] > From: [email protected] > Subject: [LUTE] Philip or Arthur's Dump > > I got a modern printout recently of Philip or Arthur's Dump - from Marsh, I believe. About 16 m. before the end there appears to be a missing measure or three. That is, the alternating C-G pattern breaks and there are two measures based on G. > I also saw mention on the lute society site catalog of a duet version. Is this the same version as Marsh? I thought I had Marsh, but I don't, I think I mixed it up with Mynshall. > I wonder if the 'missing' measure was a mistake and is in Marsh or a concordance, or perhaps someone famous has reconstructed it.
-- To get on or off this list see list information at http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
