No - width of the neck will be determined by the string spacing.  By thickness, 
I mean the distance from the surface of the fingerboard to the back of the neck.
Ned
On Nov 14, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Gregory Brown wrote:

> By "thickness", do you mean the width of the neck?
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf
> Of Edward Mast
> Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:14 PM
> To: Luca Manassero
> Cc: lute
> Subject: [LUTE] Re: 8-ch lute strings spacing
> 
> String spacing is indeed most important.  But I rarely (never?) see
> mentioned thickness of the neck.  For a couple of years I played an 8 course
> lute with a rather thin neck, which I assumed to be normal.  Then I got an 8
> course with a thicker neck and found (I do have large hands) that barred
> chords that had been difficult on the thinner neck were considerably easier
> on the thicker neck.  I quickly got rid of the thinner neck instrument.
> Perhaps something else to consider when buying a lute . . .
> Ned
> On Nov 14, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Luca Manassero wrote:
> 
>>  Dear list,
>>      five years ago at the Neuburg (Bavaria) Summer Academy I happened
>>  to try an 8 course lute built for a friend of mine by Martin Shepherd:
>>  the strings spacing fitted so perfectly that later on I e-mailed Martin
>>  to have "his" strings spacing. I still use it on all my Renaissance
>>  instruments.
>>  In any case all lutemakers I approached over the last seven years
>>  ALWAYS asked me "my" strings spacing requirements: they NEVER simply
>>  used their without asking first.
>>  Last but not least, I have played a few "exact copies" of museum
>>  instruments: in all cases an extremely narrow strings spacing made them
>>  almost unplayable (to me). Having big hands I don't see why I should
>>  play on a very narrow, mandolin-like neck. What if the original
>>  instrument (aka Gerle...) was originally built for a 10 years old
>>  little girl?
>>  Luca
>>  David Tayler on 14/11/12 18.29 wrote:
>> 
>>   It depends on the player, the technique and the size of the hands, the
>>  width of the fingers, etc., but in the critical spacing of the first
>>  three courses I would not go below 5mm center to enter between pairs
>>  and below 11.5 between the chanterelle and the next string over, if the
>>  top string is single. There is a cross point at the plucking point that
>>  is the real figure, that is, the width where the string plucked. As for
>>  the other courses, it also depends on the string material. For an early
>>  style lute, you can also use a "close parallel" spacing, but unless the
>>  maker knows how to do it, I would not try it.
>>  The reach of the hand is important in an eight course instrument, but
>>  that depends on the hand. So at eight courses, you may have to compress
>>  the spacing slightly if reach is an issue. If they live in California,
>>  I can take a look, but otherwise you may have to rely on a generic
>>  pattern, or borrow a few instruments to see if they fit. It's like
>>  buying shoes. You can ask what shoe size you need, but you still have
>>  to wear them. Ninety percent of lutes have the wrong spacing, so it is
>>  worth getting it right when it is built.
>>  dt
>>  --- On Sun, 11/4/12, Jerzy Zak [1]<[email protected]> wrote:
>> 
>>    From: Jerzy Zak [2]<[email protected]>
>>    Subject: [LUTE] 8-ch lute strings spacing
>>    To: "lute mailing list list" [3]<[email protected]>
>>    Date: Sunday, November 4, 2012, 5:06 PM
>> 
>>  Dear Lutelist,
>>  A student of mine is expacting a new 8-ch lute. The maker has little
>>  experience with an instrument of such number of courses. So we all need
>>  some advice from you. We need a typical spacing on both sides of
>>  strings, aEUR|if there is such "typical" spacing, of course. Anyway, at
>>  least a distance between the outer strings would be of help, if not all
>>  measurements.
>>  Thanks in advance!
>>  Jerzy Z
>>  ---
>>  To get on or off this list see list information at
>>  [1][4]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>> 
>>  --
>> 
>> References
>> 
>>  1. [5]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>> 
>> References
>> 
>>  1. mailto:[email protected]
>>  2. mailto:[email protected]
>>  3. mailto:[email protected]
>>  4. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>>  5. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
>> 
> 
> 
> 
> 



Reply via email to