Ideally what we need is for ppl to upload their spacings. I will
   upload one from about 20 years ago which is slightly wider than what I
   have now--I will call it "fat and happy"
   d
   --- On Thu, 11/15/12, Edward Mast <nedma...@aol.com> wrote:

     From: Edward Mast <nedma...@aol.com>
     Subject: [LUTE] Re: 8-ch lute strings spacing
     To: "Gregory Brown" <delphinconsult...@earthlink.net>
     Cc: "'Luca Manassero'" <l...@manassero.net>, "'lute'"
     <lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
     Date: Thursday, November 15, 2012, 5:18 AM

   No - width of the neck will be determined by the string spacing.  By
   thickness, I mean the distance from the surface of the fingerboard to
   the back of the neck.
   Ned
   On Nov 14, 2012, at 6:26 PM, Gregory Brown wrote:
   > By "thickness", do you mean the width of the neck?
   >
   > -----Original Message-----
   > From: [1]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   [mailto:[2]lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu] On Behalf
   > Of Edward Mast
   > Sent: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 6:14 PM
   > To: Luca Manassero
   > Cc: lute
   > Subject: [LUTE] Re: 8-ch lute strings spacing
   >
   > String spacing is indeed most important.  But I rarely (never?) see
   > mentioned thickness of the neck.  For a couple of years I played an 8
   course
   > lute with a rather thin neck, which I assumed to be normal.  Then I
   got an 8
   > course with a thicker neck and found (I do have large hands) that
   barred
   > chords that had been difficult on the thinner neck were considerably
   easier
   > on the thicker neck.  I quickly got rid of the thinner neck
   instrument.
   > Perhaps something else to consider when buying a lute . . .
   > Ned
   > On Nov 14, 2012, at 5:52 PM, Luca Manassero wrote:
   >
   >>  Dear list,
   >>      five years ago at the Neuburg (Bavaria) Summer Academy I
   happened
   >>  to try an 8 course lute built for a friend of mine by Martin
   Shepherd:
   >>  the strings spacing fitted so perfectly that later on I e-mailed
   Martin
   >>  to have "his" strings spacing. I still use it on all my Renaissance
   >>  instruments.
   >>  In any case all lutemakers I approached over the last seven years
   >>  ALWAYS asked me "my" strings spacing requirements: they NEVER
   simply
   >>  used their without asking first.
   >>  Last but not least, I have played a few "exact copies" of museum
   >>  instruments: in all cases an extremely narrow strings spacing made
   them
   >>  almost unplayable (to me). Having big hands I don't see why I
   should
   >>  play on a very narrow, mandolin-like neck. What if the original
   >>  instrument (aka Gerle...) was originally built for a 10 years old
   >>  little girl?
   >>  Luca
   >>  David Tayler on 14/11/12 18.29 wrote:
   >>
   >>   It depends on the player, the technique and the size of the hands,
   the
   >>  width of the fingers, etc., but in the critical spacing of the
   first
   >>  three courses I would not go below 5mm center to enter between
   pairs
   >>  and below 11.5 between the chanterelle and the next string over, if
   the
   >>  top string is single. There is a cross point at the plucking point
   that
   >>  is the real figure, that is, the width where the string plucked. As
   for
   >>  the other courses, it also depends on the string material. For an
   early
   >>  style lute, you can also use a "close parallel" spacing, but unless
   the
   >>  maker knows how to do it, I would not try it.
   >>  The reach of the hand is important in an eight course instrument,
   but
   >>  that depends on the hand. So at eight courses, you may have to
   compress
   >>  the spacing slightly if reach is an issue. If they live in
   California,
   >>  I can take a look, but otherwise you may have to rely on a generic
   >>  pattern, or borrow a few instruments to see if they fit. It's like
   >>  buying shoes. You can ask what shoe size you need, but you still
   have
   >>  to wear them. Ninety percent of lutes have the wrong spacing, so it
   is
   >>  worth getting it right when it is built.
   >>  dt
   >>  --- On Sun, 11/4/12, Jerzy Zak [1]<[3]jurek...@gmail.com> wrote:
   >>
   >>    From: Jerzy Zak [2]<[4]jurek...@gmail.com>
   >>    Subject: [LUTE] 8-ch lute strings spacing
   >>    To: "lute mailing list list" [3]<[5]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu>
   >>    Date: Sunday, November 4, 2012, 5:06 PM
   >>
   >>  Dear Lutelist,
   >>  A student of mine is expacting a new 8-ch lute. The maker has
   little
   >>  experience with an instrument of such number of courses. So we all
   need
   >>  some advice from you. We need a typical spacing on both sides of
   >>  strings, aEUR|if there is such "typical" spacing, of course.
   Anyway, at
   >>  least a distance between the outer strings would be of help, if not
   all
   >>  measurements.
   >>  Thanks in advance!
   >>  Jerzy Z
   >>  ---
   >>  To get on or off this list see list information at
   >>  [1][4][6]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >>
   >>  --
   >>
   >> References
   >>
   >>  1. [5][7]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >>
   >> References
   >>
   >>  1. mailto:[8]jurek...@gmail.com
   >>  2. mailto:[9]jurek...@gmail.com
   >>  3. mailto:[10]lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   >>  4. [11]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >>  5. [12]http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   >>
   >
   >
   >
   >

   --

References

   1. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   2. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=lute-...@cs.dartmouth.edu
   3. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=jurek...@gmail.com
   4. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=jurek...@gmail.com
   5. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
   6. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   7. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
   8. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=jurek...@gmail.com
   9. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=jurek...@gmail.com
  10. file://localhost/mc/compose?to=lute@cs.dartmouth.edu
  11. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html
  12. http://www.cs.dartmouth.edu/~wbc/lute-admin/index.html

Reply via email to